- NHL To Keep Labor Talks Private
- Stern: NBA In Good Shape This Year
- Daytona To Offer Mid-Race Bonus
- Barcelona, Real Madrid Outpacing ManU In R ...
- League Notes
- LPGA Begins Season With Expanded Schedule
- Shortened NBA Season Resulting In Bad Prod ...
- League Notes
- NFL Faces Decisions On L.A., Alumni
- Roger Goodell Delivers State Of NFL Addres ...
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 7/Leagues & Governing Bodies
FIA Suspends Renault's F1 Disqualification For Two Years
Published September 22, 2009
![]() |
| WMSC Says Renault Has Agreed To Make Contribution To FIA's Motoring Safety Work |
TOO BIG TO LOSE? In London, Edward Gorman reports the FIA and President Max Mosley were "accused of bowing to commercial pressures" with the light sentence. The ruling was attacked by those who believe that the FIA and Mosley are "far too close" to F1 Management Chair Bernie Ecclestone (LONDON TIMES, 9/22). Also in London, Kevin Garside notes the FIA acknowledged that the "severity of the crime was unprecedented yet found a way of not imposing a fine commensurate with it" (London TELEGRAPH, 9/22). Former FIA VP Nazir Hossein: "They've got away with it because Formula One can't afford to lose Renault." However, Ecclestone said, "That has nothing to do with it" (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 9/22).
BLOW TO SPORT: The WALL STREET JOURNAL's Sebastian Moffett writes the disclosure that the Singapore Grand Prix "was rigged, and the light repercussions for the team, add to what has been a tumultuous season for racing's most glamorous international circuit." However, Renault yesterday "gave no indication" that it would leave the sport (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 9/22). In Toronto, Norris McDonald writes Renault "didn't so much as receive a slap on the wrist for creating a situation in which people -- the driver and others -- could have been killed." The "biggest loser in this is Briatore," but for F1, this is "a disaster." McDonald: "For the first time, allegations of race-fixing were investigated and found to be true. ... The question that must be asked today is -- after this -- what company or conglomerate would want to be associated with it?" (TORONTO STAR, 9/22).







