First Data Lands Rights To Mets' Fla. Complex Orlando City Lacks Stadium Naming-Rights Partner San Diego Developer Proposing SoccerCity Alternative Virginia Tech AD Discusses Facility Upgrades Vail Resorts Acquires Vermont's Stowe Mountain Bucks' New Video Board Goes Against NBA Grain Manfred Defends D-Backs' Chase Field Stance Blue Jays Debate Rogers Renovation Themes Millennial Esports Opening Gaming Arena In Vegas Plans Released For San Diego's "SoccerCity"
SBD/Issue 236/Facilities & Venues
Decision On Cowboys Video Board Expected Before Saturday's Game
Published August 26, 2009
|NFL Competition Committee Has Forwarded
Video Board Recommendations To Goodell
NEVER TESTED BY COWBOYS' PUNTER: ESPN's Ed Werder reported while Jones "says that the team carefully researched the issue in advance, Dallas punter Mat McBriar told me he was never taken to the stadium and asked to punt to determine how high the scoreboard needed to be, as the Colts did a year earlier with punter Hunter Smith while building their new facility." McBriar estimated that he could "hit the video board on half his punts if he were trying" ("SportsCenter," ESPN, 8/25). Titans coach and NFL Competition Committee co-Chair Jeff Fisher said, "The ball is going to continue to strike, to hit, the structure, so what do we do about it? It is not a one-time occurrence" (FT. WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM, 8/26).
SHOULD RAISE BE MANDATED? In Ft. Worth, Randy Galloway writes Jones is "totally in the right with this issue." Galloway: "Jerry doesn't want to raise his baby. Period. It will stay at 90 feet unless Goodell orders otherwise. ... I don't see Jerry raising JumboJerry for anyone except Goodell, and you can bet Roger will tread carefully with this" (FT. WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM, 8/26). In DC, Gene Wang writes, "Lay this flap at the feet of the league." If the NFL "mandates Jones raise it, then it should provide for the cost of the project" (WASHINGTONPOST.com, 8/26). But in L.A., Sam Farmer writes, "Why is this even an issue?" Jones needs to "raise the boards, just as he's doing" for the October 12 U2 concert at the stadium. The game "shouldn't have to change for him." The Hartford Courant's Mike Anthony writes as soon as Trapasso's punt hit the screen, Jones and Cowboys officials "should have started on a new blueprint for placement of that monstrosity." The Baltimore Sun's Ken Murray writes the fact Jones has not been ordered to adjust the board yet "shows how powerful" he is, as Bengals President Mike Brown "already would be on the clock." But just because Jones "builds the Taj Mahal of stadiums doesn't mean he can build it to his own specifications" (L.A. TIMES, 8/26). ESPN's Skip Bayless said, "I still have to blame Jerry a little bit here because you spent $1.5(B) on this stadium and you couldn’t do your own homework?" ("ESPN First Take," ESPN2, 8/26). In Philadelphia, Bill Conlin writes, "No matter how your punter is trained to angle kicks away from returners, punting a football is not a precise art and the NFL's 85-foot height guideline for objects that overhang the playing field is not only archaic, it was not designed with a monolith overspreading a 60-yard midsection of turn in mind" (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 8/26).
MEDIA FRENZY: SI.com's Peter King wrote, "What's amazing to me, and a sign of the media times, is the amount of coverage this thing has gotten." The N.Y. Times and USA Today both had stories yesterday "all about the height of a videoboard that clearly is going to be fixed before the start of the regular season." King: "It says one thing to me: The NFL is king, and nothing is close for second place" (SI.com, 8/25).
Jones Says He Wants Cowboys Stadium
To Have Architectural Significance
SEEKING DAMAGES: In Dallas, Brooks Egerton reports Cowboys scouting assistant Rich Behm and special teams coach Joe DeCamillis filed separate lawsuits yesterday in Dallas County courts against several companies involved in building the team's indoor practice facility, which collapsed on May 2. The accident paralyzed Behm and broke DeCamillis' neck. Both the Cowboys and the city of Irving are "not named as defendants in the suits," which seek unspecified damages (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 8/26).