Jeff Gordon Hired As Full-Time Analyst For Fox "SNF" Leads Primetime For Fourth Time Ducks' Perry Miffed By Milbury's On-Air Remark MASN: Manfred Comments "Highly Prejudicial" NBC Again Airing Final EPL Matches Live Buck Anxiously Awaiting U.S. Open Broadcast Preakness Audience Down From Recent Years Media Notes StubHub Releases New Mobile Apps Ebersol: Live-Streaming App Usage Is "Theft"
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 232/Sports Media
Media Groups Send Joint Letter Of Protest To SEC Over New Policy
Published August 20, 2009
|Several News Organizations Protest SEC's
Control Over Media Under New Policy
POLICY NOT AIMED AT CASUAL FAN: In N.Y., Belson & Arango in a front-page piece note the SEC's media policy is "aimed not at the casual fan who might post a few pictures of Saturday's football game on a personal Web site, but rather those who copy television broadcasts, create their own highlight reels and post them on sites charging for access or advertising." The SEC "did not identify specific Web sites that might have prompted its policy changes," but the rules are "part of an effort to protect a vast online video archive of games and file footage that the conference will market to fans this fall" as the SEC Digital Network. SEC officials said that they are "not trying to prevent fans from sending personal messages or brief descriptions of games to their Facebook pages or on Twitter, as some fans fear," as Bloom said that enforcing such a policy "would be impractical and counterproductive." Bloom: "We want to protect our rights to have video between the conference and its members, and ban the commercial sale of photo images. Fans can post photos on their site or Facebook page, but they can't be for sale" (N.Y. TIMES, 8/20). Bloom added, "We probably took traditional media rights language and tried to apply it in a new media world." In Birmingham, Jon Solomon notes the revised policy now says "personal messages of scores or other brief descriptions of the competition throughout the Event are acceptable" (BIRMINGHAM NEWS, 8/20).
REVISIONS WERE NECESSARY: In Dallas, Jarrett Rush wrote an "all-out ban on something that you don't necessarily understand typically does more harm than good." Rush: "It seems to me, there is an opportunity here. The conference should Tweet near-continuous updates on the game for those who want it. For football update after each play. For basketball, same thing. Beat someone to the punch" (DALLASNEWS.com, 8/19). But YAHOO SPORTS' Holly Anderson wrote, "While it's entirely logical and sound for the conference (and by extension, the television networks), to shore up protections for this enormous revenue stream they've got control of, are they really going to bring the hammer down on bloggers like yours truly who want to share Eric Berry's latest interception with our audience?" (SPORTS.YAHOO.com, 8/19).
MISSING THE LARGER POINT: CNBC's Darren Rovell notes the most popular bloggers are "writing up their relevant posts while watching the game on their couch, where the SEC's rules become moot." These blogs are "well written by the biggest fans, they are willing to talk about all the rumors that every fan wants to hear and, despite having less access, come off as being closer to the team and fan sentiment than most beat writers" (CNBC.com, 8/20).
Rhodes One Of Several Jets That Have
Embraced Idea Of Using Twitter