Nationals Benefiting From Election Cycle New Jersey Paying $2.3M In Sports Betting Case Lobbying On Behalf Of Fantasy Sports ESPN Execs Undecided Over Pawlenty TV Spot McMahon Loses Bid For Conn. Senate Seat Former Athletes Star In Political Races Republicans Buy Ads During Sports Events NFL's Gridiron PAC Hands Out About $600k American Needle Ruling Could Alter Deals Narrow Ruling Made In American Needle v. NFL
SBD/Issue 196/Law & Politics
Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Appeal Of NFL Antitrust Case
Published June 30, 2009
|U.S. Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Antitrust
Suit Challenging NFL's Deal With Reebok
WHOLE NEW BALLGAME: Marquette Univ. Law School National Sports Law Institute Dir Matt Mitten noted the case "will be the first time the Supreme Court will consider the merits of the single-entity defense." Mitten added that a favorable court decision "could give the league 'a lot more room not to have to fear suits' on issues such as relocation and team ownership requirements" (USA TODAY, 6/30). Tulane Univ. Sports Law Program Dir Gabe Feldman: "A broad ruling in favor of the NFL could rewrite almost all of sports antitrust law." N.Y.-based attorney Daniel Glazer added that an NFL victory "would represent a significant change." Glazer: "Certain business activities of the NFL would not be subject to antitrust review by the government, and thus be exempt from potential government intervention and oversight" (AP, 6/29).