- WVU, Big East Reportedly Near $20M Settlem ...
- Grizzlies' Heisley Emerges As Dodgers Bidd ...
- Jay-Z Brings Style, Luxury To Nets, Barcla ...
- MLS Crew Hope Report Will Stir Interest In ...
- Franchise Notes
- A's Extend Contracts For Beane, Crowley
- Franchise Notes
- Padres Implementing Dynamic Pricing System
- MLB Franchise Notes
- Franchise Notes
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 176/Franchises
Dave Checketts Forming Group That Could Bid On St. Louis Rams
Published June 2, 2009
![]() |
| Checketts Looking To Buy Rams |
ARCH SUPPORT: Checketts in an e-mail said his group of investors has the "ability to get this done and we have communicated this to the Rams." Checketts: "We approached this with the Rams months ago and have since that time put together a partnership of both concerned St. Louisans and outside capital." Checketts, who declined to name the other investors, added, "We have reason to believe the NFL would approve our group as we have carefully explored their ownership requirements." Two sources indicated that Checketts has had "multiple discussions with Rosenbloom and 'exchanged valuations' on the sale" of the franchise. The sources added that Checketts has informed NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell "of his efforts to pursue the Rams." In St. Louis, Bernie Miklasz notes by "confidently expressing his belief that he can land the Rams, Checketts is trying to galvanize public, private and political support," which is a "smart move." Checketts can "attract more investors by making a convincing case that he's a serious player for the Rams" (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 6/2).
GOING BACK TO CALI? SI.com's Peter King wrote "we've known all along the Rams are for sale," but of new interest is that the "desire to sell is so strong now that the current owners won't force the new owner to keep the team in St. Louis." It is "open season on the Rams, and a billionaire could probably bring them" back to L.A. While the NFL reportedly "really wants the Rams to stay in the Midwest, it wouldn't be a disaster if they moved back home" to L.A (SI.com, 6/1). Majestic Realty Co. VP John Semcken yesterday said that the company "wasn't in talks to buy the Rams to house in its proposed stadium" in Industry, California. Semcken: "We're focused as always on getting the stadium approved. Until we get it finally approved, we won't begin to look at buying a team" (PASADENA STAR NEWS, 6/2).

Majestic Realty Not In Talks To Bring
Rams To Proposed California Stadium
SPIRIT OF ST. LOUIS: In St. Louis, Jeff Gordon writes to keep the NFL in St. Louis, the city's economy "must strengthen over the long haul." St. Louis is "really trending the wrong way," and it may not "be able to support three professional sports teams at a high level." Gordon writes Kroenke "could become a marvelous majority owner." However, the NFL's ban on cross-ownership has been "in place for a long time," and it is "tough to imagine the league changing the rule to help St. Louis" (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 6/2). But the POST-DISPATCH's Miklasz wrote Kroenke, the "best hope for Rams fans who want the team to stay" in St. Louis, could "lobby the NFL" to change the cross-ownership rule. Meanwhile, Miklasz contended Rosenbloom "wanted to keep the team for 5 years, maybe 10, until the financial pressures (estate taxes) made that increasingly difficult." Regardless, Rosenbloom "wasn't as aggressive as he should have been in making sure that the St. Louis business community and leadership understood that he wanted someone from this area to step forward and make a bid" for the franchise. He "could have done a better job of directly delivering that message to the STL people who loomed as potential owners." But Rosenbloom's "message of wanting St. Louis to make a pitch never got to the right people," or else it "wasn't delivered loudly enough" (STLTODAY.com, 6/1).







