Manchester United Lands Richest Kit Deal Ever Lions Owner William Clay Ford Passes Away Sights & Sounds From SXSW FiveThirtyEight Website To Launch March 17 ESPN To Air Series On U.S.' Prep For World Cup Cowboys Mount Huge AT&T Letters On Stadium Concussion-In-Sports Doc Makes U.S. Debut Stars Attend UNC-Duke Game Briefs Ganassi Salutes Target For 25-Year Relationship
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 138/MLB Season Preview
Padres Restructure Front Office, DePodesta To Report To Towers
Published April 6, 2009
|Moorad Has Completed His
Purchase Of 1/3 Of Padres
CLOSING THE DEAL: The SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL's Mike Allen notes even for a "seasoned and powerful sports executive like Jeff Moorad, it was hectic as he completed his purchase of one-third" of the Padres last month. Though Moorad and former Padres Majority Owner John Moores have "developed a friendship in recent years," Cooley Godward Kronish attorney Wainwright Fishburn, who represented Moorad in the transaction, said that there were "other reasons he was able to close the deal." Fishburn: "It was a combination of a strong price, favorable terms, and the certainty that the transaction would be completed." Moorad said that the deal, which will ultimately see his ownership group acquire 100% of the team, "could close in as little as one year or as many as five." Moorad: "The timeline we control depends on the economy. We may choose to accelerate the timeline or take advantage of the full five years." Allen notes Moorad also is "noncommittal about boosting his budget or making moves right off the bat," and Moorad said that "keeping games affordable to families will be a focus, 'especially in the short term when this economy is playing such a significant factor'" (SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL, 4/6 issue).
NO WALK IN THE PARK: In San Diego, Nick Canepa writes even if the Padres "were to contend, home attendance probably would be down, given the economy." And if the team "doesn't at least show signs of progress, one capable of entertaining, we might see more heads than automobiles rolling down Tony Gwynn Drive" (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 4/6). Also in San Diego, Jeanette Steele writes five years after its debut in '04, San Diego's investment in the $474M Petco Park has "delivered mixed results," as the neighborhood "still shows signs of the downbeat warehouse district it used to be." Fans "credit the ballpark with a downtown renaissance that has won national honors, including a 2007 Urban Land Institute Award for Excellence," and the East Village has "witnessed more than $1.075[B] in taxable development directly tied to the ballpark." The development "brings the city $8.7[M] in additional property taxes each year for downtown projects." But the "additional hotel taxes, the splashy new restaurants and the grand residential towers must be weighed against the $11.3[M] San Diego pays yearly on bonds and the $4.1[M] it spends for ballpark operating expenses." San Diego "shares certain maintenance and operating expenses with the team, and the public portion has increased every year since the ballpark opened, while the team's part has fallen" (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 4/6).