- Packers Raising Season-Ticket Prices
- Livestrong Partners With Ironman
- Lewin To Call Mets Games On WFAN-AM
- Spalding Signs Deal With May-Treanor
- espnW.com Launches Talk Video Series
- Stern: NBA In Good Shape This Year
- NBC Sports Group Hires Ron Wechsler
- Jets Exec VP Thad Sheely Leaving Team
- Classified Advertisements
- Executive Transactions
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 218/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
Jim Brown Sues Sony, EA Over Alleged Use Of Likeness In Videogame
Published August 1, 2008
Pro Football HOFer Jim Brown has sued Sony Computer Entertainment and Electronic Arts, accusing the companies of "using an electronic football-game character based on him without his permission," according to Patricia Hurtado of BLOOMBERG NEWS. The character appears in a videogame as a "muscular, African-American running back wearing the number 32 jersey who is featured in the game's 'All Browns Team.'" Brown is seeking a court order stopping the game makers from using his likeness (BLOOMBERG NEWS, 7/31). GAMESPOT.com's Brendan Sinclair noted this year's EA Sports "Madden NFL 09" videogame, among other features, includes the "licensed names and likenesses of some retired gridiron greats." EA previously "included historical teams in its games by omitting names and faces, but merely including numbers." Brown is seeking an "injunction against EA selling the game, the forfeiture of all materials bearing his likeness, and disgorgement of all profits earned" from the sale of the "Madden" games (GAMESPOT.com, 7/31). In N.Y., Jose Martinez reports the suit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, "seeks unspecified damages." Brown contends that he "never signed away the rights to the use of his image that would allow it to appear in the video game" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 8/1).
WILL IT WORK? In St. Louis, David Sheets writes Brown is "up against two huge companies making millions off of 'Madden,' and the NFL hasn't immediately rushed to his defense. Plus, there's an argument floating around that the NFL owns its past and can distribute it to the league's advantage, regardless which legends are involved" (STLTODAY.com, 8/1).







