PGA Tour Happy With Live Streams Boatright Named AD At Wichita State "Greater" Tells Story Of Arkansas Walk-On Naming Rights Sold For Field At Aloha Stadium Sabres Cap Season-Ticket Sales At 16,000 "Sports Reporters" To Feature All-Female Cast Benson Trial Date Against Estranged Family Set North Dakota State Battles FBS Temptations Raiders Zero In On Preferred Las Vegas Site Hope Solo's Future With NWSL Club In Doubt
SBD/Issue 163/Leagues & Governing BodiesPrint All
Goodell Finds No Evidence Of Patriots Taping
Rams' Walk-Through Prior To Super Bowl XXXVI
Boston Herald Apologizes For Original Story
KRAFT MAKES PUBLIC COMMENTS: Patriots Owner Robert Kraft made his first public comments on the Goodell-Walsh meeting on CNBC this morning. He appeared via satellite and held up a copy of the Herald's back page that carries the header “Our Mistake.” Kraft: “I just hope (fans) see this. ... I felt very good seeing this paper." Kraft: "This story coming out the day before the Super Bowl, the biggest game in our history going for a perfect season, was very damaging and put a cloud over us for the last three-and-a-half months and I’m glad it’s finally come to an end.” But he added, "This erroneous story coming out was really harmful and what bothers me more about this story is where it went throughout the country, … they won’t see this retraction." CNBC's Becky Quick asked Kraft about the team taping more than just the original Jets game last season. Kraft hesitated before saying, "Our coach misinterpreted the rule and these tapes that you saw went back five, six years ago, and the rule was clarified at the beginning of the ’07 season. That’s when we were penalized for what happened at the Jets game" (CNBC, 5/14).
PATRIOTS VINDICATED? The Patriots yesterday released a statement that read in part: “We have been saying all along and emphatically stated on the day of the initial report: ‘The suggestion that the [Patriots] recorded the [Rams’] walkthrough on the day before Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002 is absolutely false. Any suggestion to the contrary is untrue'” (Patriots). However, in Philadelphia, Marcus Hayes writes, “Matt Walsh, Roger Goodell and the Patriots: They’re all lying, at best, disingenuous, at least.” The Patriots issued an “outrageous statement that trumpeted their self-perceived vindication with regard to taping the walkthrough” (PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS, 5/14). In N.Y., Rich Cimini writes the Patriots are “feeling vindicated" as they released a "'We-told-you-so' statement" (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 5/14). In Providence, Jim Donaldson writes while the Patriots "had every right to be indignant, [the team] arguably forfeited the moral high ground or righteousness when it fessed up last fall to years of illegal taping" (PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, 5/14).
Specter Continuing With His
Own Spygate Investigation
WON'T GO AWAY: ESPN.com’s Pat Yasinskas wrote under the header, “Stench From This Mess Won’t Go Away.” Yasinskas: “The NFL wants to just turn away, and it’s easy to understand why.” Walsh “might not have revealed anything new but he did lay out exactly how the Patriots cheated.” Goodell was “visibly relieved that there was no evidence of a videotape” of the Rams’ walk-through (ESPN.com, 5/13). In St. Louis, Jeff Gordon writes under the header, “NFL Tries To Sweep Away Spygate, But Issues Remain.” Gordon: “Goodell pulled out his broom Tuesday and tried to sweep Spygate under the rug” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 5/14). In West Palm Beach, Tim Graham writes Spygate ended with a “whimper -- at least as far as the NFL is concerned” (PALM BEACH POST, 5/14). The PROVIDENCE JOURNAL's Donaldson writes, "It all should have been over in September. ... Whatever the reason, Spygate won't go away" (PROVIDENCE JOURNAL, 5/14). ESPN's Michael Wilbon: "This last eight months has just been hijacked by more, more, more coverage” (“PTI,” ESPN, 5/13). But in St. Louis, Bryan Burwell writes if Spygate has “come to an end, it’s not because the story no longer has legs. It’s only because Goodell wants it to go away.” The story is “not over, not one little bit, no matter how much the commissioner and the Patriots want it to go away” (ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 5/14).
THE COMMISH: ESPN’s Clayton said yesterday "was a good day for [Goodell] because what he’s been saying -- and also since February what the Patriots have been saying -- held up” (“Outside The Lines,” ESPN, 5/13). In N.Y., Gary Myers writes Goodell has done an “excellent job in nearly two years on the job and is a refreshing upgrade over Paul Tagliabue, but he was all over the map” in Spygate. Goodell “didn't distinguish himself in this mess” (N.Y. DAILY NEWS, 5/14). FOXSPORTS.com’s Alex Marvez writes the NFL’s initial response to Spygate is the “biggest black mark in Goodell’s 21 months as commissioner. By levying penalties after a mere 12-day inquiry, Goodell’s attempt to quickly turn the page became a public relations disaster.” Goodell “isn’t the only one who could have better handled the situation. Belichick’s initial refusal to discuss the situation in any detail painted him as unrepentant and helped keep the issue alive” (FOXSPORTS.com, 5/14). In Chicago, Rick Telander writes Goodell’s “logic for destroying evidence was ... bizarre and twisted.” Also, Goodell’s tone has been “one of arrogance and protectiveness” (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 5/14). The N.Y. DAILY NEWS' Cimini writes, "I like Roger Goodell. I really do, but he made a few missteps along the way that created a 'cover-up' perception. I just wish it wasn't a windbag pol like Arlen Specter, with his own agenda, that was playing the role of watchdog" (NYDAILYNEWS.com, 5/14). ESPN.com’s Matt Mosley wrote the N.Y. Daily News’ Myers “caught Goodell a little flat-footed when he pressed him on whether he knew that the Patriots’ illegal videotaping dated to 2000.” Goodell “wasn’t clear on whether he knew in advance that the videotaping went back that far” (ESPN.com, 5/13).
GOODELL TOO HAPPY? SPORTINGNEWS.com' Dan Shanoff writes Goodell "seemed relieved -- almost gleeful -- that his discussion with [Walsh] yielded nothing he didn't know already" (SPORTINGNEWS.com, 5/14). ESPN.com’s Mosley wrote Goodell during yesterday’s press conference “tried to hide the glee in his voice” after the “breathless buildup … on ESPN and the NFL Network.” It “almost seemed like Goodell was amused” by the morning’s events (ESPN.com, 5/13).
Brady Blasts ESPN For Its
Coverage Of Spygate Scandal
THIS IS ALL THERE WAS? While the media was waiting on Goodell's comments yesterday, the NFL ran clips from the tapes Walsh handed over to the league. On Long Island, Bob Glauber writes while watching the tapes, “one thought kept popping into my head: This is what the whole Spygate mess was about?” (NEWSDAY, 5/14). In Philadelphia, Don McKee writes, "The most scandalous part of the tapes ... had nothing to do with stealing signals. The footage showed several minutes of close-ups of [Chargers] cheerleaders performing during a 2002 game" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 5/14). The N.Y. DAILY NEWS' Cimini notes the room "started laughing" when the cheerleaders came on screen (NYDAILYNEWS.com, 5/14).
Sorenstam Announces She Will Retire From
Competitive Golf After This Season
LEAVING LPGA IN A GOOD PLACE: Sorenstam said she is "very proud of women’s golf and the state it’s in today." Sorenstam: "In the last 15 years, I’ve seen a tremendous change and it’s really grown to an amazing place. ... I believe that this decision comes at the right time for the LPGA. It is in very good hands with some great talent and a commissioner that really cares" (Golf Channel, 5/13). Golf Channel’s Alex Miceli said Sorenstam "made the LPGA relevant. It was something that no one really focused on ... and if it wasn’t for her the LPGA wouldn’t be where it is today” (“Golf Central,” Golf Channel, 5/13). Golfer Meaghan Francella: “She brought women’s golf to the forefront. She’s why the LPGA is where it is right now” (GOLFWEEK.com, 5/13). Golfer Lorena Ochoa: "We will miss her for sure, and we will never forget what she has done for us, as players, and for the LPGA" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 5/14). Golfer Brittany Lincicome: "I respect Annika and what she has done to advance the popularity of the LPGA Tour" (ORLANDO SENTINEL, 5/14).
Pepper Feels Sorenstam's Retirement
Will Be Big Blow For LPGA Tour
LPGA NOT ENOUGH: L.A. Times columnist Bill Plaschke said the LPGA "can’t offer her anything anymore. She’s bigger than the LPGA." Plaschke: "If the LPGA was any kind of a major league operation, if it had more exposure, if it had more money, there’s no way she’d retire. ... That shows to me the LPGA is in huge trouble. It needs to be more attractive to keep golfers in it” (“Around The Horn,” ESPN, 5/13). In Detroit, Carlos Monarrez writes, "Though I respect Sorenstam's decision to quit, I'm saddened by what sounds to be the underlying financial reason for it." Sorenstam "wants to control her financial destiny -- and competing for the LPGA's paltry purses doesn't cut it. ... In Sorenstam's case, it's much better to pursue a fuller, richer life with a family, less travel, less pressure and more lucrative financial opportunities" (DETROIT FREE PRESS, 5/14).
Sorenstam Draws Media Crowd
While Playing In Colonial In '03