- Stern: NBA In Good Shape This Year
- Shortened NBA Season Resulting In Bad Prod ...
- MLB Franchise Notes
- Potential Sports Arena In Seattle Making P ...
- MLB Franchise Notes
- NBA Sees Poor Play Quality, High TV Rating ...
- Cubs' Push For Wrigley Sign Hits Speed Bum ...
- Xfinity Running Social Media Contest
- Lakers Top Forbes' NBA Franchise Valuation ...
- MLB Franchise Notes
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 134/MLB Season Preview
Focus Turns To Cuban, Colangelo As Potential Cubs Suitors
Published April 3, 2007
|
| Cuban Among High-Profile Individuals Seen As Possible Cubs Suitors |
|
| Speculation Has Colangelo As One Of Leading Candidates To Buy Cubs |
OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES: Galatioto Sports Principal Sal Galatioto said of the Cubs sale, “There will be a huge interest by high-net-worth individuals. This isn’t just a regional brand; it’s a national brand, one of the most prestigious franchises.” TMB Industries Chair Thomas Begel, who has put together a group interested in purchasing the team, said, “There’s not a great income stream (in baseball), but look at the asset appreciation” (ESPN.com, 4/2). More Begel: “I’ve been talking to [Tribune Co.] for a number of years because I always felt the Cubs were not a strategic part of the company’s long term. The Tribune Company is primarily a media company, and frankly they’ve come under a lot of criticism for holding the Cubs. And the Cubs certainly have not been successful under their ownership” (WALL STREET JOURNAL, 4/3). Former Cubs Chair Andy McKenna is “mentioned as capable of putting together an investor group,” and sources said that Reyes Holdings CEO Chris Reyes “might consider a minority position” with the team (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 4/3).
FINDING VALUE: Smith College sports economist Andrew Zimbalist said that the Cubs could sell for $500-600M “even without Wrigley.” In Chicago, David Greising writes the Comcast stake is “believed to be worth at least” $50M, while Wrigley would be “expected to add as much as $90[M] to the asking price.” Sources said that Zell “believes Wrigley might have more value sold separately from the Cubs.” One option “may be to sell Wrigley, and then allow the ballpark’s new owner to lease it to the team’s new owner” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 4/3). The Tribune Co. bought the Cubs in ’81 for $20.5M, and a baseball official late last year “said a Wall Street acquaintance told him that Tribune was valuing the Cubs at about $1[B].” One investment banker said that the team’s pretax value “could be as high as” $800M. In November, Merrill Lynch analyst Lauren Rich Fine said that the “most relevant figure was the value of the franchise after taxes has been paid on a sale, which she estimated at” $450M. The $700M paid for the Red Sox in ’02 is the record in MLB (L.A. TIMES, 4/3). Reinsdorf, asked to comment on the reported $600-700M range, said, “Yeah, it’ll be up there” (DAILY SOUTHTOWN, 4/3). The Washington Post’s Frank Ahrens said the Cubs will probably sell for [$580-700M], “depending on how people value that big contract they gave to Alfonso Soriano in the off-season. ... It’s an easy asset to get rid of, and it’s an easy way to pay down some debt real quickly” (“Newshour,” PBS, 4/2).
TIMETABLE: The Tribune Co. said it plans to complete the sale after the ’07 season. Any sale requires the approval of MLB team owners, which “typically lengthens the process” to 6-12 months (N.Y. TIMES, 4/3). But Selig “expects a new owner to be in place” by the start of next season. Selig: “Given the timetables that I’ve heard, and the discussions I’ve already had, I think there’s a pretty good chance of that” (MLB.com, 4/2). Selig said Zell would not have to sell his stake in the White Sox. Selig: “He’s not going to own the Cubs. ... There are other owners at various times who have owned clubs and bought clubs, and I always give them a little time to sell” (DAILY SOUTHTOWN, 4/3).
|
| Tribune Co. To Include Wrigley Field In Sale Of Cubs? |
NO TEARS IN WRIGLEYVILLE: Zimbalist said of the team being put up for sale, “This is probably good news for Cubs fans. I don’t think Tribune Co. has done a lot positive for the club” (DAILY SOUTHTOWN, 4/3). In Chicago, Dan McGrath writes “because the product was so often inferior, critics came to view Tribune Co. as a bumbling operator, more interested in the balance sheet than the baseball despite a payroll that frequently ranked within baseball’s top tier.” The Cubs have had 19 losing seasons in 26 years under Tribune Co., a record that “makes the attendance figures — three straight seasons of 3 million-plus — that much more remarkable” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 4/3). The CHICAGO TRIBUNE’s Rick Morrissey writes new ownership “has to be better than the last 98 years of incompetence, right? To anyone who knows history, the answer is: No, it doesn’t. ... But this is a good day for the people who have been clamoring for new owners almost since the day Tribune Co. bought the Cubs” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 4/3).






