Gilbert Lays Out Agenda For NFLPA Exec Dir Role McDonald's Preps Three Promos Around NFL Season Marino Hiring Viewed As A Sound Business Move Univ. Of Phoenix Stadium Debuts Upgrades Players Poll: Raiders Are Least Desirable Team Cowboys, Hublot Unveil Limited Edition Watches 49ers Rip Up Levi's Turf Again NFL Franchise Notes NFL Hosts Think Tank To Address Concussions Niners Avoid Serious Issue With New Sod
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 103/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
Blast From The Past: Upshaw Denies NFL Retirees’ Allegations
Published February 16, 2007
|NFLPA’s Upshaw Denies
Retirees’ Claims In Lawsuit
SEEKING REPAYMENT: Adderley said that he had “never been sent royalties” for a deal allowing his name to be included on a line of Reebok apparel. But Upshaw noted that Reebok had “decided not to use Adderley and, therefore, no money was due him.” NFLPA outside counsel Jeffrey Kessler said that Parrish “never signed the group licensing agreement and so was not due royalties from Players Inc. licensing deals.” Parrish noted that some video games feature past NFL players’ likeness without using their names, and Ronald Katz, attorney for the retired players, argued that even if names of past players are not displayed, Players Inc. “behaves in the marketplace as if it represents all former players” (N.Y. TIMES, 2/16).