NFL Reopens Investigation Into Giants' Josh Brown CBS/NFL Net See Sharp Drop For "TNF" Roger Goodell Addresses Dip In NFL Ratings MillerCoors Brings Back '80s Madden Ad Google OTT May Have CBS' NFL Games Tannehill Echoes Belichick On Microsoft Tablet Oakland Doesn't Need To Match Raiders Stadium Offer Belichick Says He Is Done With Microsoft Tablets Owners' Opinions On Raiders' Vegas Plan Vary NFL Owners Concerned Over Dip In Ratings
SBD/Issue 103/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
Blast From The Past: Upshaw Denies NFL Retirees’ Allegations
Published February 16, 2007
|NFLPA’s Upshaw Denies
Retirees’ Claims In Lawsuit
SEEKING REPAYMENT: Adderley said that he had “never been sent royalties” for a deal allowing his name to be included on a line of Reebok apparel. But Upshaw noted that Reebok had “decided not to use Adderley and, therefore, no money was due him.” NFLPA outside counsel Jeffrey Kessler said that Parrish “never signed the group licensing agreement and so was not due royalties from Players Inc. licensing deals.” Parrish noted that some video games feature past NFL players’ likeness without using their names, and Ronald Katz, attorney for the retired players, argued that even if names of past players are not displayed, Players Inc. “behaves in the marketplace as if it represents all former players” (N.Y. TIMES, 2/16).