- Heluva Good Drops Glen Sponsorship
- Daytona To Offer Mid-Race Bonus
- NASCAR To Buy Back Digital Rights From Tur ...
- Earnhardt Jr. Talks Future, Sponsorship Cl ...
- Pocono Founder Mattioli Passes Away
- NASCAR Execs Are "Pleased" With State Of S ...
- Marketplace Roundup
- League Notes
- NASCAR Owners Optimistic About Sponsorship ...
- Patrick To Forgo Indy 500, Race In Coca-Co ...
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 161/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
Crazy Eights: Dale Jarrett To Join Waltrip, Toyota Next Year
Published May 15, 2006
|
| Jarrett (r) Will Drive Toyota Entry For Waltrip’s Racing Team In ‘07 |
PAYING THE DRIVER: While speculation is that Jarrett will earn “exponentially more” with Toyota than Ford, Toyota Racing Development USA CEO Jim Aust said, “If drivers are going to earn more money, it’s because of the old law of supply and demand. ... If you are in fact a very competitive driver who runs upfront over all, just because of expansion of NASCAR, prices are going to go up.” RYR GM Eddie D’Hondt said of Toyota’s efforts to land drivers for Nextel Cup, “We [NASCAR] don’t have a draft, so their draft exists by cold calling and seeing people in the garage and in a sense trying to woo them to their team. And that makes it hard on us” (N.Y. TIMES, 5/14). In Charlotte, Jim Utter wrote Ford “did not take to the news [of Jarrett’s move] kindly.” Ford Racing Technology Dir Dan Davis: “Toyota is going to have its work cut out for them in Nextel Cup, no matter how much they plan on spending” (CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 5/14).
|
| UPS’ Promo Merchandise For No. 88 Ford Approaching $1M A Season |
LIKEABLE: USA TODAY’s Theresa Howard reports sales of UPS’ promo merchandise around Jarrett’s No. 88 Ford “are approaching $1[M] a season.” Jarrett is appearing in ads for the company via The Martin Agency, Richmond, in which he “‘races’ the [UPS] truck on a NASCAR track.” An Ad Track poll showed that 26% of people familiar with the ads like them “a lot,” compared to the average rating of 21%. Also, 19% thought the ads were “very effective,” compared to the 20% average (USA TODAY, 5/15).






