- Stern: NBA In Good Shape This Year
- Daytona To Offer Mid-Race Bonus
- Barcelona, Real Madrid Outpacing ManU In R ...
- League Notes
- LPGA Begins Season With Expanded Schedule
- Doritos, A-B Win Top Super Bowl Ads
- ESPN Helps Boost Disney's Q1 Profit
- Shortened NBA Season Resulting In Bad Prod ...
- League Notes
- NFL Faces Decisions On L.A., Alumni
Upcoming Conferences and Events
-
Mar 21-22
-
Mar 22
-
May 23
-
May 30-31
-
Jun 5-7
SBD/Issue 48/Leagues & Governing Bodies
Columnists, Editors Opine On MLB’s Latest Drug Policy
Published November 17, 2005
![]() |
|
Ryne Sandberg (c) A Proponent
Of Baseball’s New Policy |
TOO LITTLE: In Philadelphia, Stephen A. Smith: “If this satisfies you, consider yourself a fool. What happened to the two-year ban for first offenders? How about the lifetime ban for second-time offenders? ... I thought a lifetime ban was exactly that, a lifetime ban. Why on earth should someone ... have the right to have his case heard by an arbitrator?” (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 11/17). In DC, Sally Jenkins writes, “We shouldn’t think for a minute the problem is truly solved. ... There’s little evidence that deterrents consistently work on elite athletes” (WASHINGTON POST, 11/17). In Denver, Richard Krieger: “The cheats are still ahead. And their lead is growing. While the politicians prodded and baseball yammered, researchers were quietly churning out a new generation of steroids for which there are no tests” (ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS, 11/17).
![]() |
|
Columnists Say Fans, Media Share The Blame
With Selig, Fehr For Not Reacting Faster |
EDITORIALS: In addition to columnists, coverage of MLB’s new policy has spilled into the editorial sections of many newspapers nationwide.
GOOD MOVE: The CINCINNATI POST: “Instead of being an embarrassment, [MLB] is poised to become a model for fair play” (CINCINNATI POST, 11/17). The BOSTON HERALD writes MLB “finally gets it” (BOSTON HERALD, 11/17). The CHICAGO TRIBUNE: “Baseball had to adopt three strikes and you’re out for its very survival. If fans could turn against Rafael Palmeiro, they could just as well turn against the game” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 11/17).
![]() |
|
New Deal Should Shore Up MLB’s Integrity
|
GOOD FOR EVERYONE: The HARTFORD COURANT: “Selig got it right when he said the sport’s tough new drug testing policy ... will be good for the sport, good for the health of the players and good for the health of people all over the country” (HARTFORD COURANT, 11/17). The L.A. DAILY NEWS: “Fans can now watch baseball knowing that the athleticism on display is real, not juiced. And parents no longer need to worry that their kids will think the way to become a big league player is to abuse their bodies with drug” (L.A. DAILY NEWS, 11/17).
NOT SO FAST: The Cleveland PLAIN DEALER: “Baseball’s executives and union leaders could no longer hide. ... Other professional sports and the Olympics long ago cracked down on performance-enhancing drugs. Their efforts aren’t perfect every year, some dopes get caught. Still, it’s a battle worth waging. Welcome, [MLB], to the fight” (PLAIN DEALER, 11/17). The CINCINNATI ENQUIRER: “Considering the ravages of steroid use and its social implications, baseball seems woefully detached from reality. ... Congress should keep the pressure on to ensure the testing program isn’t a sham. Baseball hasn’t earned an intentional walk here” (CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, 11/17).









