Bright Nike Apparel Turns Heads At Aussie Open Nike Breaks Out Bright Colors At Aussie Open Univ. Of Florida Extends Nike Deal Through '24 Nike's Coin Toss Ad Goes Viral On Twitter Nike Unveils Uniforms For CFP Championship Knight Exerts Influence On Oregon Athletics Nike Reports Relatively Strong Q2 MJ Leads eBay Athlete Merch Sales Univ. Of Miami Could End Nike Deal New Nike Campaign Features LeBron's "Heroes"
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/Issue 137/Sponsorships, Advertising & Marketing
Nike's Trademark Dispute With Under Armour; "Freestyle" Case
Published April 4, 2003
Nike’s DRI-FIT Name Subject Of Suit
Nike has filed suit in U.S. District Court in OR against Under Armour, "primarily for using Nike's trademark `DRI-FIT' term on Web site addresses linking to Under Armour's homepage," according to Darren Rovell of ESPN.com. The suit claims that Nike has trademarked "DRI-FIT" for use on its products three times over the past decade. Under Armour registered Web sites containing the "DRI-FIT" name in June '01. Nike's complaint reads, "Under Armour is using the domain names to attract and divert Internet users to Under Armour's Web site for Under Armour's commercial gain. On information and belief, Under Armour's use of domain names has been and continues to be made with a bad faith intent to profit from Nike's `DRI-FIT' marks." Nike is asking for preliminary and injunctive relief of the use of the domain names, $100,000 in damages for each of the four Web sites or profits generated from confusion, which would triple under trademark infringement law (ESPN.com, 4/3).
FREESTYLE: The Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday issued a summary judgment affirming the lower court's decision concluding that Nike did not illegally borrow from Game Over's "Shakin" promo for its "Freestyle" ad. Game Over originally sued Nike in '01 (THE DAILY).