The Bears have "offered to revise" the Solider Field
renovation legislation so the state of IL will be
"reimbursed" if city hotel tax revenue "falls short" of
projections, according to McKinney & Spielman of the CHICAGO
SUN-TIMES. The Bears' "basic financing formula" has the
state making annual payments of $21-102.3M over the next 30
years to the IL Sports Facilities Authority to cover the
stadium debt, with the state's "upfront payments" to be
reimbursed monthly from Chicago's 2% hotel tax, which
financed Comiskey Park. Despite "assurances" from the team
and Mayor Richard Daley that hotel tax revenues will grow by
5% annually over the next 30 years, IL lawmakers "pondered
the state's possible financial exposure" if hotel taxes
failed to equal the annual debt payments. The Bears are now
"proposing using surplus hotel taxes in succeeding years to
pay off any earlier shortfalls." To the state's legislative
"skeptics" the proposal is "incremental progress" but does
not "calm fears that too little time exists in the General
Assembly's fall veto session to adequately consider such a
sprawling and complex financial equation." Another
"lingering concern" for lawmakers is how much money the
Bears will gain from the deal, which they have not
disclosed. Meanwhile, the Bears selected Kenny Construction
as its construction management team (CHI. SUN-TIMES, 11/19).
ACTION: IL Gov. George Ryan has "urged" the General
Assembly to "move quickly" on authorizing the $387M in
"state-backed" bonds for the renovation project. Ryan: "I
don't know why they need six or eight months to study this
thing." Ryan on the $100M loan the NFL has promised the
Bears, "[The NFL] certainly [has] a lot of places they could
spend that money. It's available now. It may not be
available in January or February" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 11/18).
Under the header, "Stadium Plan Faces Some Hefty Barriers,"
a CHICAGO SUN-TIMES editorial declares that a renovated
stadium is "within grasp" if the plan "doesn't collapse from
the weight of every special interest in Illinois piling on."
Calling the plan a "fair one," the editorial states that
while it is "disingenuous to sell the plan as one that is
pain-free for taxpayers, the truth is, mostly taxpaying
visitors end up with the tab" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 11/20).