Glut Of NFL Games Affecting Ad Rates Dish Dropping ESPN Classic For VOD Service Could Suspension Push Simmons Away? An Inside Look At Decision To Suspend Simmons ESPN Ombuds: No Choice But A Suspension Bill Simmons Suspended Three Weeks Capitals Aim For Military Feel For '15 Winter Classic Ombudsman: Recent Coverage Impressive "MNF" Overnight Rating Down In Week 3 Ray Lewis Criticized For Favoring Ravens
Upcoming Conferences and Events
STRICT X-GAMES ADVERTISING RULES KEEPING SOME SPONSORS AWAY?
Published May 28, 1999
With less than a month to go before the start of the Summer X-Games in S.F., city officials "are scrambling to raise private money so taxpayers don't end up footing the bill," according to Yumi Wilson of the S.F. CHRONICLE. The city has received "tentative promises from businesses to help pay for much of" the $700,000 cost of staging the week- long event, but it is still $150,000 short of what it needs. X-Games Host Committee Chair Gavin Newsom "had hoped" to use corporate sponsorships to pay for police, traffic control and city services, but Newsom said, "We're not getting the $100,000 to $200,000 sponsors that we expected." Newsom said that one problem is that members of the city's corporate community "know or care little about the X-Games." But "perhaps the biggest problem" is ESPN's advertising policies for the Games. Because ESPN gives its corporate sponsors exclusive rights to showcase their logos and banners at the Games, few local businesses "are interested in fronting cash for an event where they will get little or no on-air exposure" (S.F. CHRONICLE. 5/28).