Sections
SBD/23/Leagues Governing Bodies
Print All-
D-DAY IN DALLAS: NBA OWNERS SET TO VOTE ON RE-OPENING CBA
The NBA's Board of Governor's is "poised to take the first step in a journey that will lead to a modified collective bargaining agreement or an uncertain labor future," according to David Moore of the DALLAS MORNING NEWS. League officials "confirmed" that today in Dallas owners will void the final three years of the NBA's agreement and "return to the negotiating table" with the NBPA. Moore also reports that NBPA Exec Dir Billy Hunter has said that he plans to meet with the league around April 1 (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 3/23). NBA Deputy Commissioner Russ Granik: "Lockout isn't part of our vocabulary right now. ... You never know, but we have a very cordial and professional relationship with union leadership, and we'll do our best to try and maintain that." Hunter: "[W]e've still got between now and October and November to work out a deal." In N.Y., Mike Wise pointed to the "smart" participants in the negotiations, Granik, Hunter and NBA Commissioner David Stern, and wrote to "expect both sides to compromise before the summer ends" (N.Y. TIMES, 3/23). In Boston, Peter May wrote the difference between today and the last NBA labor disruption in '95 is Hunter, "who has shown already that he is both reasonable and dogged" (BOSTON GLOBE, 3/22). NOT OPTIMISTIC: In N.Y, Mitch Lawrence wrote that Stern is "expected to get a pulse on whether his employers are willing to shut down operations for what might be a year." One ownership source: "There are some owners who want to make a big-time stand and get to the root of the issues." While there are questions of how "unified" ownership is "to commit to more than a summer-time lockout," Lawrence added that "hawks," including the Jazz's Larry Miller and the Clippers' Don Sterling, "will push to lock the players out for a year, if necessary" (DAILY NEWS, 3/22). In L.A., Mark Heisler wrote Stern "reportedly is ready to lock the players out till next Christmas or longer" (L.A. TIMES, 3/22). -
MICHAEL OVITZ EMERGES AS NEW FORCE TO LAND L.A. FRANCHISE
NFL owners are "expected to award" Cleveland an expansion franchise as early as this week, leaving Houston and L.A. "in a match race to become the NFL's 32nd franchise," according to T.J. Simers of the L.A. TIMES. But Simers wrote that L.A.'s New Coliseum Partners (NCP), "who have been running in place for the last two years ... could be passed by a new prospect just as the competition is officially set to begin." Michael Ovitz "has caught the fancy of NFL officials with a San Francisco 49er-like plan for a stadium and shopping mall" in Carson, CA. The Carson site "has been advanced successfully in recent weeks" by Ovitz, who has been working with an OH-based mall developer. One "high-ranking" NFL source: "It's a little early yet, but this project appears to have a lot of potential." Simers: "At no time during its dogged campaign ... have the [NCP] received such an NFL endorsement." The NCP "appear to also have fallen behind Hollywood Park, which recently altered its strategy to the NFL's satisfaction." It "proposed selling a 30-acre piece of property to the NFL, or any NFL- designated owner interested in constructing a stadium on the site." While some NFL owners remain interested in the Dodger Stadium site, the NFL has "been advised" by the Fox Group that their "attention will be directed solely on improving Dodger Stadium" (L.A. TIMES, 3/22). LONGER TIMETABLE? In Houston, John Williams writes that league owners "warned" yesterday that it "could be as long as two years before a decision" is made on the 32nd team. While "several" owners said Houston is ahead of L.A. in getting a new football stadium in place, "league owners will give [L.A.] all the time it needs to put together a stadium plan." Broncos Owner Pat Bowlen: "We're talking about a couple of years, at least" (HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 3/23). -
MLB COMMISSIONER SCENARIO: A COLEMAN HEATER?
Because MLB management "has accomplished previously unimaginable things" during the reign of Acting Commissioner Bud Selig, "many owners have lost their desire to hire an outside candidate," according to Tom Haudricourt of the MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL. With COO Paul Beeston running the business side, the "prevailing theory is 'don't fix what ain't broke.'" One possible scenario has Beeston remaining as COO, Selig staying in his post as Chair of the Executive Council and "someone such as" NL President Len Coleman being "named commissioner in what amounts to a figurehead role" (MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL, 3/22). In Philadelphia, Jayson Stark wrote there are "indications Coleman has emerged as a prime in-house alternative to Selig as permanent commissioner" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 3/22). IF A TREE FALLS IN THE FOREST...: In N.Y., Murray Chass, writing on the inaction during the search for a commissioner, asked, "So does anybody really care?" Red Sox CEO John Harrington: "Everybody does." But Twins Owner Carl Pohlad said there has "been less conversation 'than you'd think.'" Pohlad: "It's been strangely silent" (N.Y. TIMES, 3/22)....In Boston, Peter Gammons wrote that Selig and Beeston "should seriously consider enlisting" Paul Molitor as a Deputy Commissioner and liaison to the MLBPA after he retires at the end of the season. Gammons: "[F]ew union leaders have ever understood management's side more than Molitor" (BOSTON GLOBE, 3/22)....In N.Y., Tom Keegan wrote that Expos ownership is a "topic that should have been discussed" at MLB's quarterly meeting. Keegan called the Expos a "disgrace. And their competitors are growing sick and tired of it." One MLB club exec: "Teams are losing money going there to play. A lot of people are fed up with the way that's being run up there" (N.Y. POST, 3/22). -
NFL OWNERS MEET IN ORLANDO; CBA DEAL LIKELY TO BE APPROVED
NFL owners meetings opened in Orlando yesterday, and the Management Council's Exec Committee voted to approve the extension of the CBA, according to USA TODAY's Larry Weisman. The full group of owners "considers" the CBA today and it needs 23 of 30 votes in favor to pass. The NFLPA's Board of Player Reps ratified the deal unanimously in HI on Friday. If the owners vote against the deal, the NFLPA "says it will not renegotiate and will let the current labor deal expire after the 2000 season" (USA TODAY, 3/23). WELLINGTON'S BEEF? Giants co-Owner Wellington Mara, "one of the most respected men" in the NFL, may speak out on the proposed CBA this week in Orlando, according to Mike Freeman of the N.Y. TIMES. One owner: "Wellington is strongly opposed to one part of this agreement and in turn, the entire thing. When Wellington talks, people listen. He will swing votes, and a week from now we could be back at the negotiating table with the union." Agreement supporters fear Mara could give a "passionate plea on why the guaranteed contract provision" of the deal is "a truly bad idea." But Freeman added that the deal "will most likely be approved by only a slim margin" (N.Y. TIMES, 3/22). Mara dismissed the N.Y. Times report and said he would not urge owners to vote against the deal: "Not me. You've got the wrong guy" (Paul Needell, Newark STAR-LEDGER, 3/23). OTHER NEWS: In Baltimore, Vito Stellino wrote that instant replay, which is also on the agenda at the meetings, "faces an uphill fight" to be approved (Balt. SUN, 3/22). -
WTA'S MCGUIRE POLITELY DECLINES ATP OFFER OF JOINT EVENTS
WTA Tour CEO Bart McGuire said yesterday that while the ATP Tour has proposed joint men's and women's tennis events which pool sponsorship and TV revenue, his "priority" is to obtain a new long-term title sponsorship deal and a new TV deal for the women's tour. Speaking with the media at the Lipton Championships, McGuire said he has "philosophic concerns, economic concerns, and some very practical concerns about the joint venture concept." McGuire: "I really doubt that the WTA Tour and the ATP Tour can agree on prize money, revenue sharing, television exposure, to say nothing of issues like practice and locker room facilities." McGuire said he had not "quite shut the door on the joint venture concept," but added that it is "not likely to happen in the near future." McGuire will "consider the creation of new combined events on an individual basis" (WTA Tour). In Sunday's N.Y. TIMES, ATP Tour CEO Mark Miles said he was "enormously frustrated" by the WTA Tour's perception that any merger would undermine its position as the No. 1 women's sport in the world. Miles: "I'm absolutely convinced that nothing they can do on their own would generate as much revenue as they would receive if they did collaborate with us, and I also don't think the combined tour would impair the ATP Tour's identity or that of the women." The TIMES' Robin Finn: "Is tennis at a gender crossroads just in time for the millennium? It looks that way" (N.Y. TIMES, 3/22). THAT'S RIGHT, THE WOMEN ARE STRONGER? In Miami, Edwin Pope wrote on the crowds at the Lipton and called it the "biggest sports-spectator event in South Florida history." He added that "male professionals are trying to get back up to speed with the females since Martina Hingis, Venus and Serena Williams and Anna Kournikova ... arrived. Women are coming on stronger than ever while the men's game is headed for a crowd-appeal crisis" (MIAMI HERALD, 3/22). OTHER WTA NEWS: McGuire said the Tour's Board of Directors ratified the settlement to the players' dispute announced in February. The Board also voted to add three "independent, senior business executives, with no financial interest in tennis," and agreed to eliminate the requirement that matters be unanimously agreed upon." Finally, the Tour will also open a European office in London to be headed by its Dir of European Operations Georgina Clark (WTA Tour).




