First Data Lands Rights To Mets' Fla. Complex Lakers Adjusting To Life Under Magic Regime Clark Calls MLB Rule Change Discussions "Ongoing" Four Companies Sign Up As WBC Global Sponsors Video Views Around Swimsuit Issue Up Big NFL Optimistic On Expanded Mexico Presence Cubs Using "That's Cub" As '17 Marketing Slogan Wiggins' Former Coach Defends WNBA Red Sox To Implement New Personnel Database Astros' Crane Continues To Increase Payroll
SBD/6/Leagues Governing Bodies
PGA TOUR BEGINS ITS CASE AGAINST MARTIN; PUBLIC WEIGHS IN
Published February 6, 1998
In day four of Martin v. PGA Tour, Ken Venturi, who during his win at the '64 U.S. Open "walked the course in 100-degree heat with severe dehydration," testified that Martin "should not be allowed" to use a cart, according to Thomas Heath of the WASHINGTON POST. Venturi: "It's changing the level of competition." Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Scott Verplank also testified yesterday as the Tour began its case, and all "agreed" that walking is "an integral part of tournament golf." Nicklaus added that carts would "tarnish" golf's image on TV and would "reinforce the belief that it is a non-strenuous, country club activity." While each witness said that they "admire" Martin, each said that his use of a cart would be "unfair" to other competitors (Thomas Heath, WASHINGTON POST, 2/6). VENTURI TALKS: While questioning Venturi, Martin's attorney William Wiswall tried to establish that since Venturi won the '64 Open, the fatigue must not have affected him. Wiswall: "The fatigue didn't affect you?" Venturi: "It damn near killed me." Verplank testified that he "benefited from" the injunction Martin was granted last year, which allowed players to ride a cart at the PGA qualifying tournament. Verplank, who won the event: "I rode the whole week. I felt great" (N.Y. TIMES, 2/6). PGA Tour attorney William Malendon: "You're starting to see now what we believe this case is all about. ... It's about whether or not an organization such as the PGA Tour or [MLB] or the NBA can make the rules for its competition" (ESPN, 2/5). IF HE LOSES? ESPN's Jimmy Roberts said that PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem and former USGA President Judy Bell will "perhaps" be the final witnesses. Roberts reported that Martin said that "one of the reasons he may not appeal, is because he was told by [U.S. Senator] Tom Harkin that if he does lose, it is entirely possible that some action will be taken in Congress" (ESPN, 2/5). But in L.A., Jim Murray warned against Congressional intervention and wrote it "has no business dictating how" the game of golf should "be played." Murray: "The [ADA] is meant to give the disabled an opportunity. It's not meant to give them an advantage. If it is, it's unconstitutional" (L.A. TIMES, 2/5). THEIR WORST NIGHTMARE? Media reaction continues on the Martin case: In SI, Rick Reilly, on the Tour's stance: "Shame on them. ... Shame on every self-important and greedy Tour pro who won't budge an inch of tradition to fit in a spoonful of compassion" (SI, 2/9). In K.C., Jeffrey Flanagan PGA Tour comes across as "nothing but a collection of predominantly white, wealthy, completely self-centered men incapable of envisioning anything beyond their own greed" (K.C. STAR, 2/6). While a PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS editorial calls the Tour's stance a PR "disaster," it says it is "right to stick by its rules" (PHIL. DAILY NEWS, 2/6). PUBLIC POLICY: A CBS SportsLine poll posted this week asked users, "Should the PGA Tour allow disabled golfers to ride in carts?" Of 5,031 respondents, 63% said yes. In a similar survey posted January 28, ESPN SportsZone asked whether the PGA Tour's stance on Martin was insensitive. Of the 4,931 respondents, 55% said the Tour's stance was insensitive (THE DAILY)....Martin's trial was the subject of Thursday's "Talk Back Live" on CNN (2/5).