ESPN Won't Continue Airing French Open NBCU Marking Year-Out Date From Rio CBS Revives SportsLine With Pay Site UFC Fight Pass Could Tailor Content To Viewers NBC, ESPN, Fox Expected To Bid On EPL Mortensen Cancels Appearance On WEEI New TV Deal Boosts Cardinals Value Over $1.6B Manfred: Court Ruling Won't End MASN Case Bears Change Training Camp Media Policies Gold Cup Final Popular On Univision
MORE MIXED REVIEWS FOR FOX FOOTBALL EXPERIMENT
Published December 12, 1995
Reviews continued from media writers on Fox's experiment using Terry Bradshaw and Jimmy Johnson serving as co-analysts with no play-by-play announcer during Saturday's game. In Washington, Leonard Shapiro says to give Fox a "smidgen of credit" for the move, but adds the broadcast "desperately needed" someone to inform viewers of the action (WASHINGTON POST, 12/12). In New york, Richard Sandomir calls it a "dismal experiment/publicity stunt" (N.Y. TIMES, 12/12). NEWSDAY's Steve Zipay calls it a "bad" experiment and suggests increasing graphics and turning up the audio of the stadium announcer (NEWSDAY, 12/12). In Dallas, Barry Horn writes "maybe expectations were too high," and notes the idea could improve. Or, it "may have been a one-shot deal, a gimmicky ratings grab for what should have been a very missable game" (DALLAS MORNING NEWS, 12/11). In Detroit, Steve Crowe calls it a "rousing success" -- but as "a once in a while" move (DETROIT FREE PRESS, 12/11). In Boston, Jack Craig writes the Fox duo "ranged between being subpar and a joke" (BOSTON GLOBE, 12/12).