Latest Rays Ballpark Proposal Dead Horseshoe Casino Sponsors Reds' Riverfront Club IMS Stop Highlights Rolling Stones Tour Kings Planning Redevelopment For Old Arena MLS Atlanta: Training Site Our Top Priority Facility Notes Minnesota Officials Critique Stadium Roles NFL In L.A. Looking More Likely Than Ever No Stadium Plans Yet For Minnesota United St. Pete City Council To Vote On New Rays Deal
Upcoming Conferences and Events
POLL FINDS CHICAGO RESIDENTS OPPOSE USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Published August 28, 1995
When asked whether they favor using public funds to finance a new stadium to keep the Bears from moving out of state, 62% of Chicago-area residents said no, 26% supported the idea and 13% had no opinion, according to results of a CHICAGO TRIBUNE poll published on Sunday's front page. The poll also found that there is "almost no public support" for Bears President Michael McCaskey's dream of a "suburban tax-financed stadium." The TRIBUNE's Swanson & McRoberts report that "the only stadium option that appears to have broad public support" is a multipurpose domed stadium adjacent to Chicago's McCormick Place. Other poll results: 44% favor a domed stadium, 41% an open-air field, and 15% had no preference. 55% disapprove of how McCaskey has handled the stadium issue, 12% approve, and 32% had no opinion. The poll surveyed 600 "heads of households" in the metro-Chicago area. Margin of error is +/- 4% (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 8/27). INDIANA BEARS? An out-of-state group has made a bid for the Bears. During Thursday's Bears preseason game, a coalition of Indiana business and political leaders made an offer to "consider several land parcels" that meet the team's criteria of a location within 20-30 miles from the Chicago Loop. The group claims advantages including a favorable tax climate and a natural surface playing field (Adrienne Drell, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 8/27). But Sue Ellen Christian writes the plan "is long on concept and short on details. There is no specific funding source, no specific site and no funding mechanism" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 8/27).