Sale Says White Sox Put Business Ahead Of Winning Yahoo Sports To Use Current Name For Now U.S. Cellular Field To Host Rare Music Festival MasterCard Draws Social Exposure During MLB ASG Report: Jackson Won't Return To ESPN's "Countdown" Indians' Attendance On The Upswing Twitter Wants To Be Sports "Digital Hangout" Social Studies: PGA Tour's Preston McClellan Media Notes Twitter To Stream Live MLB, NHL Games
BASEBALL BEGINS TO COPE WITH TV HANGOVER
Published June 28, 1995
MLB's television committee, chaired by Phillies President Bill Giles, met yesterday in Philadelphia to discuss finding a new national television partner. Giles said they hope "to have a new TV deal no later than November or December" and "to have a consultant hired in the next several days." Giles said MLB has "heard indirectly from CBS" and that they "like what Fox is saying so far." Acting MLB Commissioner Bud Selig: "We're shaping the direction we want to go. I think this is definitely a positive for baseball" (Hal Bodley, USA TODAY, 6/28). WHICH WAY DO WE GO? In this week's VARIETY, John Dempsey writes that "there are two schools of thought about what happens" now that ABC and NBC have walked. Dempsey: "The first whispered scenario is that league owners already have a secretly negotiated multiyear contract in their back pocket from either CBS or Fox. ... The second school of thought, as voiced by Hal Katz, chief executive of Katz Marketing and Media, is that 'baseball is in a terrible negotiating position'" (VARIETY, 6/26 issue). FOX TROT: MLB's "path seems sure to end at Fox," according to N.Y. NEWSDAY's Steve Zipay. Fox might consider a bid "as high as $200 million a year," writes Zipay, and "some industry insiders speculate that Fox would offer a Saturday afternoon Game of the Week package -- starting with an hour-long pre-game show - - in the first half of the season, then shift to prime time in July and August." Other changes Fox could bring: "innovative production"; telecasts of "all LCS games"; late afternoon weekday World Series games; and, "promotional clout" (N.Y. NEWSDAY, 6/27). WHITHER THE SPONSORS: The Baseball Network's "break-up" has "caused many to wonder if lame duck broadcasters ABC and NBC will do right by advertisers, since they have no fiduciary responsibility to the advertisers that cut unguaranteed deals," according to Jeff Jensen of AD AGE. Bill Croasdale, President of Western Media International: "Advertisers will be watching carefully to see if there's any falloff in promotion, but ABC and NBC are honorable. They will live up to their obligations to baseball and advertisers" (Jeff Jensen/Joe Mandese, AD AGE, 6/26 issue). P.R. CAN BE AN UGLY BUSINESS: A number of columnists are reporting that Dick Ebersol and Dennis Swanson gave USA TODAY's Rudy Martzke an exclusive on the TBN story, in exchange for Martzke's promise not to call MLB for a reaction (Mult., 6/27- 28). This morning, Phil Mushnick takes aim at Ebersol and Martzke. Mushnick: "NBC, ABC and their newspaper delivery boy can spin it any way they choose, but this was a case of granstanding. ... Ebersol's the No. 1 apologist for any property NBC is renting and the No. 1 critic of any property NBC loses or loses out on. And, while others in the print media indulged his obvious act, only his USA TODAY hand puppet hasn't yet wised up and/or been turned off" (N.Y. POST, 6/28).