Mets Unlikely To Make Another Splash In Free Agency Why Was Bears-Eagles Flexed To NBC? Phillies Not Planning To Increase Payroll Sounders To Increase Capacity In '14 Craig Morton Sues NFL Over Dangers Of Playing Dolphins Investigation Won't Wrap In '13 Blazers President Enjoys Busy First Year Super Bowl Organizers Unveil Mass Transit Plan Redskins Sorting Through Shanahan Options ESPN Sees Bump For Week 14 "MNF"
SHOULD AL STAY OR SHOULD HE GO? RAIDERS HEADING HOME?
Published June 22, 1995
Several reports yesterday indicated that the Raiders were close to an announcement that they were moving back to Oakland, setting off a flurry of "no comments" and denials. KNBR radio in San Francisco was the first to report that the Raiders would move back. On his KNBR show, former Raiders coach John Madden said ,"It's closer now than it's ever been. It's going to happen, and it's going to happen today" (KNBR, 6/21). Sources said that if the decision is indeed final, it would be because Raiders Owner Al Davis "became extremely concerned that construction of a new L.A. stadium ay Hollywood Park would not be completed by '97, forcing him to spend three years in the L.A. Coliseum (Plaschke & Springer, L.A. TIMES, 6/22). In the East Bay, the OAKLAND TRIBUNE reports that "throughout the day, East Bay officials exchanged drafts of a letter of intent with [Davis], tweaking the language to satisfy the Raiders and themselves" (Li, Staats & Ronningen, OAKLAND TRIBUNE, 6/22). DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING? NFL spokespersons said "no final decision had been made," and Davis told the AP that "he could not say for sure what was happening." One league official said Davis "was struggling with a very difficult decision and might not know which way he's going from one minute to the next" (Timothy Smith, N.Y. TIMES, 6/22). WHO'S SAYING WHAT? In L.A., Plaschke & Springer write, "Al Davis has decided to move the Raiders back to Oakland, but the deal will not be finalized until legal details are worked out" (L.A. TIMES, 6/22). In Toronto, Gary Picknell writes, "Oakland is preparing for a welcome-home celebration" (TORONTO SUN, 6/22). L.A. TIMES column header: "Raiders move north is a definite maybe" (L.A. TIMES, 6/22). USA TODAY header: "Oakland, be prepared for more disappointment" (USA TODAY, 6/22). In Baltimore, Vito Stellino reports Davis is either close to moving, "or he's using his former coach, John Madden, to give him leverage in his talks with [L.A.] officials" (Baltimore SUN, 6/22). Header over SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS piece: "Remember: Davis has played this game before" (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 6/22). John Czarnecki of the "NFL on Fox" called it "a last minute ploy": "My gut tells me Al will stay." NewSport's Fred Edelstein: "I spoke with the highest echelons of the NFL (Wednesday), and Al Davis' spin to them was, 'I have no deal with anybody'" (Rudy Martzke, USA TODAY, 6/22). CNN's Nick Charles: "From all reports, it looks like the Raiders are going long and deep back to Oakland." Former Raider/Fox NFL analyst Howie Long: "I don't know whether it's a reality or not or a ploy at the last minute to coax along the Hollywood Park people. Who the heck knows?" CNN's Danny Sheridan: "This will give him a home field advantage second to none in the NFL, and you certainly don't get that in laid-back L.A. Number two is obviously financial incentives. He'll be guaranteed in ticket sales $2.5 million for every home game, plus approximately $85 to $90 million in stadium renovations. And lastly, several minority partners have told Al, 'If you don't move back to Oakland, I want to be bought out.' That's also a considerable amount of money. It's a great move for the NFL and a great move for the Raiders" ("Sports Tonight," 6/21). NETWORK REAX: If the Raiders leave L.A., it leaves the No. 2 media market without an NFL team. Both NBC Sports President Dick Ebersol and Fox Sports President David Hill declined comment, but Fox spokesperson Vince Wladika said "it's a league matter." TNT analyst Pat Haden: "The upside for the networks is they'll get to televise more games in Los Angeles, because they were hampered by local blackouts from non-sellouts. But the league still has to have a team in Los Angeles" (USA TODAY, 6/22). IF THEY DO LEAVE: If the Raiders do leave, the L.A. TIMES' Plaschke & Springer write that the league "intends to bring one existing and one expansion team to the area, but only after construction begins on a modern stadium that would be attractive to potential owners" (L.A. TIMES, 6/22). In Seattle, Laura Vecsey writes, "Yesterday, the Seahawks- to-L.A. rumor mill was at full-tilt boogie, now that Al Davis might be reversing himself and heading back up the [CA] coast" (SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, 6/22).