Sterling, Ballmer Meet About Clippers Sale NASCAR's France Calls RTA Unnecessary ESPN Up For MLB Telecasts At Midpoint Thunder Will Not Wear Tag Honoring '79 Sonics NBA Summer League Sees Record Attendance Cubs To Open Jack Daniel's Patio At Wrigley NFL Notes Astros Take PR Hit With Unsigned Top Pick MLB Seeing Success With Replay System Carmelo Gets Into Venture-Capital Industry
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/19/Leagues Governing Bodies
GRANTHAM RESIGNATION CONTINUES TO RAISE QUESTIONS
Published April 19, 1995
NBA players "were portrayed yesterday as being outraged that they have not been informed of the reasons behind the abrupt resignation" of NBPA Exec Dir Charles Grantham, writes Murray Chass of the N.Y. TIMES. "Some players, according to their agents, believe the union is engaged in a cover-up of the real reasons" for Grantham's departure. A joint release from the union and Grantham on Friday cited only "irreconcilable differences," and as of yesterday players still had not been informed what that meant. In an interview, Grantham denied all rumors: "How many organizations have you seen change leaderships? It's never one thing; it's a series of several things. Leadership wanted to go in one direction, I in another. There was disagreement. I chose to resign." Simon Gourdine, the NBPA's General Counsel and a former Deputy Commissioner of the NBA, has taken over as Exec Dir. While one agent says that "no one expects Simon to be the one negotiating with David Stern," Chass floats a "bizarre" scenario by which Richard Ravitch, former negotiator for MLB's owners, would take over the NBPA's negotiations. Ravitch headed New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority when Gourdine was counsel there. In addition, labor lawyers and agents both raised concerns that a financial settlement was reached with Grantham without a vote of player reps, and that Gourdine assumed the Exec Dir position without a vote of the Executive Board (N.Y. TIMES, 4/19). MORE DIGGING: Jackie MacMullan reports that Grantham was "forced out because of alleged improprieties involving expense accounts." One player rep: "It had nothing to do with collective bargaining" (BOSTON GLOBE, 4/18).