Mets Unlikely To Make Another Splash In Free Agency Why Was Bears-Eagles Flexed To NBC? Phillies Not Planning To Increase Payroll Sounders To Increase Capacity In '14 Craig Morton Sues NFL Over Dangers Of Playing Dolphins Investigation Won't Wrap In '13 Blazers President Enjoys Busy First Year Super Bowl Organizers Unveil Mass Transit Plan Redskins Sorting Through Shanahan Options ESPN Sees Bump For Week 14 "MNF"
LEGAL FIGHT WITH RAMS COULD BE LONG AND BLOODY FOR NFL
Published March 24, 1995
The potential for a "lengthy" and "nasty" court fight between the NFL and the Rams is examined by Thomas George in this morning's N.Y. TIMES. "You know the league doesn't want it," writes George. But by voting down the Rams move to St. Louis, their feeling "must be a strong one to opt for the courts rather than allowing the move." Rams President John Shaw said he saw a group of owners forming to block the move because they "see the opportunity we have and wish they had it. Pure jealously." Before the vote, the league reportedly played a tape of Rams Owner Georgia Frontiere "passionately giving reasons why the league had to right to prevent" the Raiders from moving in the early '80s. George writes the "crux of the matter" is whether the league is treating Frontiere unfairly because she is a woman. Shaw calls their chances for legal success "excellent" -- but George adds, "So, too, are the chances for an ugly spectacle during the NFL's most fruitful times. And for plenty of blood" (N.Y. TIMES, 3/24). SPORTS ILLUSTRATED's "Scorecard" reports the NFL "stands little chance of winning in the courtroom with the argument it is currently making," but that keeping a team in the L.A. market during a period of legal action is their "top priority" (SI, 3/27 issue).