PGA Tour Overnights Up On CBS City Of Oakland Faces Tough Raiders Decision Brady, Goodell Ordered To Appear In Court ESPN Won't Continue Airing French Open Adidas Reportedly Courting James Harden Classified Advertisements Red Sox' Lucchino Stepping Down Executive Transactions NCAA Granted Stay In O'Bannon Case Record Crowd Watches American Pharoah
SBD/7/Law PoliticsPrint All
In a column in Sunday's ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, Donald Ratajczak writes the City of Atlanta "loses competitively to the surrounding communities by hosting sporting activities," and because of that, an area sports authority is needed. Ratajczak notes that the City of Atlanta footed the extra $300,000 for additional safety and traffic needs and additional expenditures "in excess of a half million dollars." Ratajczak says that while the city does gain revenue from hosting large events, "probably a third of all spending generated by the Super Bowl falls outside Fulton County," with that money having "no impact on city revenue." Ratajczak: "Counties outside Fulton and even the remainder of Fulton outside Atlanta will receive windfalls and few expenditures burdens. Therefore, sports activities within the city enrich other jurisdictions at the expense of the city." Reasons cited for the need for a metro sports authority: To contract with local community safety agencies and cover lost property taxes (ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, 2/5).