SMI's Admission Revenue Down 5% in '14 Lionsgate Chair Emerges As Hawks Bidder MLS, Union Reach Five-Year CBA Deal ESPN Paying $7-9M For Hockey World Cup Univ. Of Kentucky Extends Nike Deal Classified Advertisements NBA, WNBA Players Appear In LeanIn PSA Executive Transactions NFL Draft Will Utilize Chicago's Grant Park Adidas Expects "Robust" Sales Growth
SBD/7/Law PoliticsPrint All
In a column in Sunday's ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, Donald Ratajczak writes the City of Atlanta "loses competitively to the surrounding communities by hosting sporting activities," and because of that, an area sports authority is needed. Ratajczak notes that the City of Atlanta footed the extra $300,000 for additional safety and traffic needs and additional expenditures "in excess of a half million dollars." Ratajczak says that while the city does gain revenue from hosting large events, "probably a third of all spending generated by the Super Bowl falls outside Fulton County," with that money having "no impact on city revenue." Ratajczak: "Counties outside Fulton and even the remainder of Fulton outside Atlanta will receive windfalls and few expenditures burdens. Therefore, sports activities within the city enrich other jurisdictions at the expense of the city." Reasons cited for the need for a metro sports authority: To contract with local community safety agencies and cover lost property taxes (ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, 2/5).