Astros Formally Introduce Reid Ryan Sources: MLSE Initiates Search For GM Twitter Stream NBA Game Highlights Iranian Wrestling Team Exits Tour Bassmasters Inks Pair Of Sponsorships Classified Advertisements SMI Chair & CEO Bruton Smith Q&A Development Proposed For TD Garden Front Maloofs Agree To Deal With Sacto Group Billy Hunter Sues NBPA, Derek Fisher
Sections
SBD/6/Franchises
Print All-
DOES FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING MEAN A SALE FOR SONICS?
In a "minor shift in the business structure," Ackerley Communications restructured of all of its holdings and left the Sonics as a separate corporation, instead of being one of 14 subsidiaries. But according to MCCLATCHY NEWS' Bart Wright, "an implication was immediately obvious. Large companies interested in testing the market for a certain portion of their holding often restructure in ways that set apart the desirable holding." But Ackerley Communications CFO Dennis Curley said the restructuring "changes nothing," and is "no indication at all of any reason to want to sell anything" -- including the Sonics. Wright writes that the move comes at a "curious time," and that the value of the franchise is higher now than any other time in its history, with "sizable" fan support a new arena, and expansion fees (Bart Wright, McCLATCHY NEWS SERVICE, 2/5).
-
HAPPY IN HARTFORD, HAMMERED IN HARRISBURG
While the Hartford Hellcats returned from the brink of elimination on Friday, the CBA turned to another failing franchise -- the Harrisburg Hammerheads. According to the league, the Hammerheads were shut down on Thursday for "failure to comply with the by-laws and directives of the league's board of directors." Although the league "didn't elaborate" on the team's conduct, Hammerheads owner Van Farber said that the CBA "had notified him it would fold the team if several terms were not met by last Wednesday." Farber said the two main conditions -- paying for a $72,000 court he promised to both the city and state, and acquiring an additional $50,000 line of credit -- "were impossible to meet in such a short time" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 2/5). The CBA is "expected to hold a dispersal draft" Monday, then spend whatever is necessary to rearrange schedules and travel plans (Flounders & Feeley, HARRISBURG PATRIOT, 2/5).
-
PSL DEADLINE PASSES; WILL NFL ASK FOR PIECE OF PSL PIE?
Friday's midnight deadline for the purchase of Permanent Seat Licenses in St. Louis produced a last minute rush that FANS Inc. officials estimate drove application totals to between 50,000 and 60,000. However, officials are still unsure if the 46,000 seats set aside for PSLs will be sold out. Because PSLs will be distributed by section, some sections may have more applications than seats. FANS will know later this week whether the PSLs will sell out. Either way, "organizers are elated" with the response, with the $60M generated by PSLs slated to go towards paying for the Rams' move. FANS' deal with the team set a goal of selling 40,000 PSL and club seats by March 10 and 50,000 by the '95 opener (Virgil Tipton, ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 2/5). NFL'S PIECE OF THE POT? Bernie Miklasz reports that NFL sources told the ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH that the league "may decide to ask the Rams and FANS Inc. for a percentage" of revenue generated by the PSLs. While the league allowed the Carolina Panthers to use PSLs for stadium construction, Miklasz says the NFL "may be opposed" to $27M of the PSL money being "earmarked to retire bonds to improve Anaheim Stadium." Miklasz thinks the league is "angling as a prelude to negotiations" with the team. Rams President John Shaw has taken the "early position" that the team has no obligation to pay a relocation fee to the league. Miklasz: "The guess is that Shaw and the NFL will initially take extreme positions and then negotiate a settlement somewhere in the middle. The NFL may back off any pledge to garnish PSL money if Shaw agrees to pay the relocation fee" (ST. LOUIS POST- DISPATCH, 2/4). Will McDonough reports NFL owners "want to make sure that gate money that should be going to them as the visiting team (40%) is not being funneled back to the home team via luxury box revenue." Visiting teams do no share in luxury box revenue but shares in all other seat money. McDonough notes that "some owners also want to take a second look at what is going on in Carolina with ticket revenues" (BOSTON GLOBE, 2/5). PRACTICE FACILITY: Under a proposal submitted Friday to the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, the city would pay a maximum of $5M to build the Rams a new practice facility. Under the lease agreement with the city, the city-county convention visitors commission is required to pay for a facility. Estimates have ranged as high as $16M. The city plans on paying for the facility with a 5% amusement tax on Rams tickets (Thom Gross, ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, 2/4). -
SHARKS REFUTE FINANCIAL WORLD STORY
Although the latest issue of FINANCIAL WORLD estimates that the Sharks posted an operating profit of $15M last year, team President Art Savage said the figure was closer to $4M. FW claimed "hockey owners wanted a new contract with the players in place before it became apparent just how much money teams were collecting from a new generation of arenas that began operating in San Jose and Anaheim." In its February 14 issue, FW reported that revenue from new arenas, a TV deal, and long-term marketing agreements helped determine the league's strategy because NHL execs "knew that the longer the negotiations dragged on, the more apparent the league's imminent prosperity would become." Savage said FW has both the "team's earning's and the owners' strategy wrong." Savage: "It's is unfortunate (the author) doesn't have the slightest idea what he is talking about and he is able to publish it in a publication that's fairly well respected." The SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS estimates the Sharks made about $10M last year, which Savage also disputes. Savage said his figure of $4M, "based on audited statements he would not release, is inflated" because it does not include $2.5M in signing bonuses (Barry Witt, SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 2/4). FW also reported the Sharks are developing a movie script, educational software, video games, and a coffe-table book. Writes FW's Jason Starr, "Since the Sharks are developing these projects themselves, they will probably have to pay only a royalty to the league -- about 8% to 10% of the product's wholesale price for use of the NHL logos -- and keep the rest" (FW, 2/14 issue).
-
VIKINGS MAY FACE MORE LEGAL PROBLEMS FROM EMPLOYEES
Minneapolis attorney Marshall Tanick said he represents "a dozen employees and former employees who have found it necessary to hire an attorney to resolve issues related to the Vikings' workplace." Tanick said there are no sexual harassment claims and that about half his clients still work for the team (Bruce Orwall, Minneapolis STAR-TRIBUNE, 2/2). GREEN A HOSTAGE? STAR-TRIBUNE columnist Joe Soucheray criticizes the team for their "poorly staged theatrics" in the videotape the team released of Dennis Green talking about the incident. Soucheray: "I am convinced that Dennis Green, like Bobby Hall, was saying only what his captors forced him to say" (Minneapolis STAR-TRIBUNE, 2/2).




