NFLPA Could Sue Over Hardy Suspension MLB Still On Pace To Reduce Game Times Thomas Wants To See MLB Inner-City Academies MLB National Viewership Off To Good Start NFL's Katz Dishes On Schedule Mets Outpacing Yankees In Early Season Ratings NFL Praised For Greg Hardy Suspension Judge Approves NFL Concussion Settlement S.F. Law May Ban Tobacco At AT&T Park Nate Silver: Las Vegas Bad For NHL
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/10/Leagues Governing Bodies
BASEBALL HELD HOSTAGE -- III: WHAT LOCAL PAPERS ARE SAYING
Published February 10, 1995
The following are excerpts from editorials compiled from 25 newspapers in 18 MLB markets: ANAHEIM: ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER: "The President and Congress should keep their mitts out of the baseball industry" (ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER, 2/7). ATLANTA: ATLANTA JOURNAL: "The President has no authority, and Congress has no business, in this dispute" (ATLANTA JOURNAL, 2/9). BALTIMORE: Baltimore SUN: "Perhaps a presidential gun held to their heads would induce a voluntary settlement. But the gun Mr. Clinton is brandishing has no bullets and both sides know it" (Baltimore SUN, 2/9). WASHINGTON TIMES: "Let W.J. Usery ... continue to argle-bargle with the major-league gang. There's no legitimate federal role involved" (WASHINGTON TIMES, 2/10). WASHINGTON POST: "This a labor dispute in a non-essential business, and it's up to the contending parties, not the federal government, to work it out" (WASHINGTON POST, 2/10). BAY AREA, CA: SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS: "We won't propose a solution to the baseball strike. We do have an opinion on who else has no business playing umpire: the President and Congress" (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS, 2/9). BOSTON: BOSTON GLOBE: "Enough! Let no more energy be wasted on these egos, especially not in the halls of Congress" (BOSTON GLOBE, 2/9). BOSTON HERALD: "Though Congress shouldn't force a solution ... it should revoke the owners' anti-trust exemption" (BOSTON HERALD, 2/9). CHICAGO: CHICAGO TRIBUNE: "The first bad idea was for the President to involve himself in this affair in the first place" (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, 2/9). CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: "The President ought not ask the fans -- as citizens -- put up with even more by shoving their government into an intrusive, no-win situation" (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, 2/9). CINCINNATI: CINCINNATI POST: "Americans do not have a constitutional right to entertainment, and that's reason enough for Congress to stay out of the baseball strike -- as the White House should have" (CINCINNATI POST, 2/9). CLEVELAND: Cleveland PLAIN DEALER: "Congress should have much more important things on its mind than the future of a game. Americans, meanwhile, will find a way to survive without major league baseball" (PLAIN DEALER, 2/9). DETROIT: The DETROIT FREE PRESS is against Congress passing binding arbitration legislation: "If lawmakers want to nudge the parties toward an agreement, a more appropriate action would be the repeal of the major leagues' antiquated exemption" (DETROIT FREE PRESS, 2/9). HOUSTON: HOUSTON CHRONICLE: "Baseball's fracture has to be healed by baseball interests themselves. That may be sad and painful. But don't make a federal case out of baseball's rhubarb" (HOUSTON CHRONICLE, 2/9). LOS ANGELES: L.A. TIMES: "Congress should get off the bench and make a play" (L.A. TIMES, 2/9). MIAMI: Ft. Lauderdale SUN-SENTINEL: "Save congressional involvement for real crises -- like a steel strike or lock-out during a time of war or severe economic depression -- not for a labor dispute that puts one set of millionaires against another" (Ft. Lauderdale SUN-SENTINEL, 2/9). MILWAUKEE: MILWAUKEE SENTINEL: "The spectacle of a president intervening in a sports dispute about which fewer Americans seem to care is just that: a spectacle" (MILWAUKEE SENTINEL, 2/10). MILWAUKEE JOURNAL: "Clinton's decision to seek congressional action ... is a useful initiative that could help break the stubborn impasse" (MILWAUKEE JOURNAL, 2/8). MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL: ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS: "Baseball is show business, not an essential industry. Ultimately, owners and player should resolve their own differences, while the nation's leaders shoulder more critical duties" (ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, 2/8). Minneapolis STAR TRIBUNE: "It isn't Congress' job to settle the baseball strike. ... It is time, however, for Congress to take indirect action by doing what it probably should have done decades ago: remove the antitrust exemption" (STAR TRIBUNE, 2/9). NEW YORK: N.Y. TIMES argues Congress is not the place to solve the dispute: "There may be some merit in a broad Congressional redefinition of the rules under which baseball operates": eliminating the exemption (N.Y. TIMES, 2/9). NEWSDAY is against the Clinton legislation: "We've advocated removing the antitrust exemption -- there's no justification for it and it would put more pressure on the owners to negotiate in good faith" (NEWSDAY, 2/9). PHILADELPHIA: PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER: "Trust us esteemed leaders of Congress, few voters in America will blame you for bending the sacred principles of free enterprise just a bit to give them their game back. Get it done" (PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, 2/8). SAN DIEGO: SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE commends Clinton for his efforts but notes there is "no compelling national interest in lawmakers' forcing these spoiled millionaires to stop their bickering" (SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, 2/9). SEATTLE: SEATTLE TIMES: "Congress does not need to force a solution to the Major League Baseball strike. ... Nothing says negotiators have to listen to a president, but to do so courteously and seriously is the American custom, just like paying attention to that song they play before every game" (SEATTLE TIMES, 2/9).