NFL Bags Ban May Be Boon To Vendors UFC Faces Foreign Fighter Issue In Boston MLBers Call For Stronger PED Sanctions USTA Sues Filmmakers Over Williams Sisters Doc NBPA In No Rush To Hire New Exec Dir Murdoch Planning Soccer Summer League NFL Sets New Security Restrictions MLB Eyes Return Trip To Australia After '14 Bettman Addresses Issues Facing NHL NFL Teams Beef Up Security For iPad Playbooks
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/18/Leagues Governing Bodies
BASEBALL HELD HOSTAGE -- DAY 99: OWNERS UNVEIL TAX PLAN
Published November 18, 1994
"Baseball ownership presented a new contract proposal to striking players yesterday, but it appears the long-awaited alternative to management's salary cap proposal will not lead to a quick settlement," according to Peter Schmuck in this morning's Baltimore SUN. The MLBPA may have a response today, "but only if they are satisfied they have enough information to properly analyze the ownership proposal" (Baltimore SUN, 11/18). MLBPA General Counsel Gene Orza: "We need to spend some time analyzing a 102-page document that we saw for the first time today. ... The owners have had their time at the plate. It's our half-inning" (Larry Whiteside, BOSTON GLOBE, 11/18). REAX: "The tax concept puts the owners and players on the same philosophical footing, but the severity of the tax -- believed to climb above 100% -- works in the same manner as a cap and might make a compromise difficult" (Ross Newhan, L.A. TIMES, 11/18). "It could be a starting point, but days, maybe weeks will be needed to make it workable for the players" (Hal Bodley, USA TODAY, 11/18). The tax proposal is a "step towards agreement, philosophically, if not practically" (Mark Maske, WASHINGTON POST, 11/18). KEEPING THE CAP ON THE TABLE: The owners also revised, but did not withdraw, their salary cap. Removed was the $1B guarantee in players' salaries; added were fixed salaries for 1st through 4th year players. "The changes would make it easier for the owners to implement their proposal" if there is no settlement (Claire Smith, N.Y. TIMES, 11/18).