SBD/6/Leagues Governing Bodies


     The NHL owners' "anger appeared to stem from the fact that
they, for the first time, apparently offered up a tax on gate
receipt revenue as a means of generating support funds for small
market teams."  The inclusion of a revenue tax "marked a
significant departure from previous offers" (Damien Cox, TORONTO
STAR, 10/6).  Mark Everson calls the owners' offer to tax gate
receipts a "major shift" and predicts it could "be the basis for
an agreement, once blood pressures drop."  Bettman, on Goodenow's
inclusion of a gate receipts tax in the union proposal:  "He
thought I couldn't get it past the Board of Governors.  Well, I
can" (N.Y. POST, 10/6).  Goodenow reported that during the talks,
McMullen told the NHLPA, "The hell with small markets, that's not
what this is about" ("SportsCenter," ESPN, 10/5).
     SPECIFICS:  Larry Brooks lays out the NHL's latest revenue-
sharing plan in this morning's N.Y. POST:  1)  Using the '93-94
average payroll of $14.1M as a "trigger," there would be a flat
1% payroll tax per million up to the trigger; 2) There would be a
marginal 5% tax rate for each $325,000 above the trigger; 3) A
flat 3% tax on gate receipts for the top 16 revenue teams.  The
NHL "is willing to negotiate the trigger position.  It has also
proposed a minimum team payroll, with funds generated from the
taxation monies dedicated to salary" (N.Y. POST, 10/6).  ESPN's
Al Morganti reported that the NHL brought its 125% ceiling on a
payroll tax down to 122% ("SportsCenter," 10/5).  In Toronto, Bob
McKenzie reports the league also proposed a rate proposal that
"progressively taxed every team on every payroll dollar -- even
those under the league average -- up to a minimum of 105 percent"
(TORONTO STAR, 10/6).  Goodenow said the union will be preparing
a counter-proposal "over the next day or so" ("SportsCenter,"
ESPN, 10/5).
     UNITY CHECK FOR BOTH SIDES:  In New York, Mark Everson
reports a "significant schism has formed" among the owners. The
Rangers, Red Wings, Flames, Canadiens and Maple Leafs "are
believed to be pressing for a settlement," with the Devils,
Bruins and Flyers "dug in" (N.Y. POST, 10/6).  In Winnipeg this
morning, Brian Smiley reports at least two Jets -- "one, a very
high-profile player -- are experiencing severe financial
difficulties" (WINNIPEG SUN, 10/6).
     DEFINING "REVENUE":  Goodenow also criticized NHL VP Brian
Burke for giving a "one-sided picture" of the league's offer to
guarantee the players 63% of all revenue.  The NHL definition of
revenue "leaves out marketing, the new Fox network TV deal,
expansion fees, pay-per-view potential in Canada and other
revenue sources" (Tony Gallagher, Vancouver PROVINCE, 10/6).
Bettman said the figure on NHL losses in '92-93, which the league
claims to be $32M, does not include expansion fees from the
Lightning and Senators shared by the other 22 clubs (Jim Smith,
N.Y. NEWSDAY, 10/6).  Bettman: "A business doesn't, on an on-
going basis, reports its operating revenue to include
extraordinary sales of assets.  We're not in the business of
selling expansion franchises every year" (Len Hochberg,
Return to top
Video Powered By - Castfire CMS Powered By - Sitecore

Report a Bug