Questions Remain In Phillies' Front Office Portland Group Wants MLB Team Men In Blazers Planning To Hold Convention White Sox To Host Faith Day Topps Signs Astros SS Carlos Correa Schilling Bumped From "Sunday Night Baseball" Jose Bautista Refuses Sportsnet Interviews Columnists Implore MLB To Install Nets Tigers Repair Damage From Fallen Concrete Blue Jays' Anthopoulos Deserves Credit
METZENBAUM SURRENDERS ON ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Published October 3, 1994
Any hope for Congress to intervene in the baseball strike "wilted on the Senate floor" when Howard Metzenbaum (D-OH) withdrew his legislation that would have temporarily lifted the exemption. Metzenbaum's "surrender" came during a "spirited debate" as he attempted to attach his amendment to an appropriations bill. But with bipartisan opposition forming and the likelihood of a "second amendment that would cripple his rider," the retiring Metzenbaum passed "the baton" to his colleagues, Orrin Hatch in particular (Larry Whiteside, BOSTON GLOBE, 10/1). Acting MLB Commissioner Bud Selig said the clubs were "grateful for the overwhelming support," but claimed the "No" votes in the Senate would have been about 2/3 (THE DAILY). MLBPA Exec Dir Don Fehr said the union would lobby Congress again on the matter when it reconvenes in January (Claire Smith, N.Y. TIMES, 10/1). WHAT'S NEXT? Peter Gammons writes the MLBPA will file a complaint with the NLRB to try to block a possible owners' impasse declaration, but with the "November 1 Total Chaos date on the horizon, no one moves." Two problems the owners may not have considered if they plan to use replacement players: 1) The Blue Jays cannot open the season without an agreement because it is against Ontario law to use replacement labor; 2) It may be impossible to get work visas for foreign players to work as replacements, as some owners hoped to do with Hispanic players (BOSTON GLOBE, 10/2). BASEBALL NOTES: The owners informed ABC and NBC they will decide in a month whether they intend to renew The Baseball Network for '96. The original deal allows for any of the partners to opt out if the combined revenues for '94-'95 didn't reach $330M, which is virtually impossible because of the strike (Mark Maske, WASHINGTON POST, 10/1).