IndyCar Ponders How To Attract Fans Long Term NHL Coaching Salaries Likely To Change MLB Looking Closer At Holding Games Abroad Euro Tour Hopes To Close Gap With U.S. Circuit Many Indifferent Toward New Extra Point Rule Goodell Open To New Info From Brady NFL Could Hear Relocation Requests In Late '15 Mexico, Germany Could Host NFL Games Kraft Will Not Fight NFL's Deflategate Sanctions NFLPA Formally Requests Goodell Recusal
Upcoming Conferences and Events
SBD/16/Leagues Governing Bodies
ATTORNEY FILES SUIT AGAINST MLB AS ANTITRUST TALKS PICK UP
Published September 16, 1994
Debate continued yesterday on the state of baseball's antitrust exemption. In Manhattan, attorney Carl Person filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the exemption. Person is willing to press the case to the Supreme Court if it will force the players and owners back to the bargaining table (Ireland & Kleinknecht, N.Y. POST, 9/16). LIFT THE BAN: Two papers called on Congress to lift the ban. The Baltimore SUN: "The first cancellation of a World Series in 90 years emphasizes the urgency of the problem. We say to Congress, don't wait till next year. In fact, given the history of the past two decades, you shouldn't have waited till this year" (SUN, 9/16). WASHINGTON POST editorial: "It really is time for Congress to consider doing away with baseball's antitrust exemption. ... The game's executives are given to dire warnings about doing this; they warn that it would be the end of baseball as we have known it. Gee, does that mean we wouldn't have a World Series?" (WASHINGTON POST, 9/16). MORE TALK: Richard Sandomir writes, "Baseball has survived past attempts [to repeal the exemption], but the strike and lost season have drawn renewed attention to the exemption and, to many, painted it as the villain behind the labor impasse" (N.Y. TIMES, 9/16). Peter Passel writes: "Wanna see the baseball club owners really squirm? Repeal their exemption from antitrust laws" (N.Y. TIMES, 9/16). American Enterprise Institute economist Irwin Stelzer says a repeal is a "no brainer": "It wouldn't do any harm, and it might do a lot of good" (N.Y. TIMES, 9/16).