Boston Bid Hinges On Proximity Of Venues Boston Mayor Changes Tune On Olympics Bid Boston Bid To Use Computer Model To Make Case Could Oslo's Move Be Impetus For IOC Change? IOC Won't Reopen Bid Process For '22 Games IOC To Make Hosts Sign Non-Discrimination Clause USOC Pressing Forward With '24 Bid Could DC Olympic Stadium Be 'Skins New Home? Ted Leonsis, DC '24 Organizers Make Pitch Boston Could Have Edge In '24 Bid
Upcoming Conferences and Events
ATLANTA COUNCIL MEMBERS CONTINUE TO ATTACK MEGA-SIGNS
Published September 14, 1994
Atlanta councilwoman Carolyn Banks today will attempt to link a proposed mega-sign ordinance to completion of a city services contract with the ACOG, according to this morning's ATLANTA CONSTITUTION. The ACOG city services contract details how much the ACOG will pay for municipal services, such as police protection. Banks contends that the city services contract also applies to the mega-signs ordinance because city workers will be forced to erect the huge billboards. The mega-sign ordinance allows for a maximum of 50 temporary signs near Olympic athletic venues, the signs are about six times larger than a standard billboard. The ordinance has received substantial criticism from Atlanta council members who have alleged that the mega-signs infringe on the legal rights of advertisers who have not paid for marketing rights to the Olympic Games. Banks said that she was "unconcerned" that her attempts to link the ordinance with the city services contract could "drag on for months": "I may be labeled as an obstructionist, but that's OK" (Lyle Harris, ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, 9/14).