Overnight Ratings: NASCAR From NHMS Vikings Stadium Funds Coming From Charitable Gaming Ravens Refute Report Of Ray Rice Coverup Broncos-Seahawks Boosts Week 3 Overnights Army Re-Evaluating NFL Spending Classified Advertisements NFL To Revamp Personal Conduct Policy Paterno Movie Put On Hold At HBO Sports Betting Bill Losing Steam In Canada Rutgers' Hermann Embroiled In Another Controversy
Upcoming Conferences and Events
More Legal Moves In Bounty Case As NFL Seeks Defamation Dismissal
Published July 5, 2012
However, Vilma’s lawyer, Peter Ginsberg, told SportsBusiness Journal, “Jonathan’s defamation lawsuit focuses exclusively on statements Mr. Goodell has made publicly and outside the confines of the CBA. Mr. Goodell, like all citizens, must abide by certain standards and laws.” He added, “Having the title of ‘Commissioner’ does not provide Mr. Goodell with a license to make the accusations and allegations he has made against Jonathan in public forums without facing the same scrutiny as other citizens.”
Vilma amended his initial complaint against the NFL to take into account Goodell’s Tuesday denial of his appeal. And he also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order this afternoon, seeking for the Louisiana federal court to block his suspension. The NFL and Goodell asked for an Aug. 1 hearing to argue that the lawsuits should be dismissed. The lawsuits filed by Vilma have been consolidated.
Meanwhile, the NFLPA also filed a lawsuit today against the NFL on behalf of the other three suspended players, Scott Fujita, Will Smith and Anthony Hargrove. The arguments are fairly similar: that the NFL relied on faulty evidence and did not offer a fair process. And as with Vilma’s now consolidated lawsuits, the NFL’s response is that federal labor law requires the disputes to be adjudicated through the CBA’s dispute resolution mechanisms.